In a major development in Nigeria’s judiciary, Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court in Abuja has stepped down from handling the case involving suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. The decision, announced on March 25, 2025, follows a petition from Senate President Godswill Akpabio questioning the judge’s impartiality.
The case was set for a hearing when Justice Egwuatu declared his recusal, citing the need to maintain public confidence in the judiciary. He stated that the case file would be sent back to the Chief Judge for reassignment to another judge.
Access Our Exclusive Past Questions & Answers PDF Below!
Contents [hide]
Background of the Case
Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central Senatorial District, was suspended from the Nigerian Senate for six months on March 6, 2025. The suspension stemmed from alleged misconduct, including violations of the Senate’s Standing Orders. In response, she filed a lawsuit challenging the Senate’s disciplinary actions, leading to the involvement of Justice Egwuatu.
On March 4, 2025, Justice Egwuatu issued an interim order stopping the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions from taking further actions against the senator. He emphasized that the Senate must follow constitutional provisions and its own rules.
Akpabio’s Petition and Its Impact
After the interim order, Senate President Akpabio, through his legal team, raised concerns about the judge’s neutrality and filed a petition to have him removed from the case. In response, Justice Egwuatu recused himself to avoid any perception of bias.
This development introduces delays in resolving Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s legal battle. The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court must now assign a new judge to the case. Additionally, the Court of Appeal is set to hear an application from Senate President Akpabio, seeking to halt proceedings in the Federal High Court.
Reactions and Implications
The case has sparked widespread reactions from political analysts, civil society organizations, and the public. Many argue that the judiciary must remain independent to uphold democratic values. The legal battle also raises concerns about legislative accountability and whether lawmakers’ rights are adequately protected.
Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension and subsequent legal challenge highlight the tensions between Nigeria’s legislative and judicial systems. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how the judiciary handles disputes involving lawmakers and executive officials.
Conclusion
Justice Egwuatu’s withdrawal underscores the complex relationship between Nigeria’s judiciary and legislature. As the case awaits reassignment, it remains a focal point in discussions about political influence, judicial independence, and the rule of law in Nigeria.
Sources
- Breaking: Judge hands off Natasha’s case, cites Akpabio’s petition – Vanguard
- Judge withdraws from Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suit after Akpabio’s petition – Premium Times
- Judge recuses self from Natasha’s case – Daily Post Nigeria
Discover more from Allmedia24 News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.